Posts Tagged ‘Quality Control’

AS9100 Documentation

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

AS9100 documentation structure is outlined in the ISO 10013 Standard – Guidelines for quality management system documentation. This standard recommends using a three-level hierarchy. In practice, many businesses use a 4-level documentation model that includes records: AS9100 Quality Manual, level 1; AS9100 Procedures, level 2; AS9100 Instructions, level 3, and AS9100 Records – level 4.

If we start from the manual, how are we going to write our quality manual without knowing what standard this manual is for? The quality policy supposes to define it. The policy defines what standard or standards, a company wants to comply with. If you like this idea, your SAE AS9100 QMS will contain five levels as in the following list:

9100 Quality Policy – level 1

AS9100 Quality Manual – level 2

SAE AS9100 Procedures – level 3

AS9100 Instructions – level 4

AS9100 Records – level 5

Document titles for your AS9100 QMS

As you may have noticed, the titles of AS9100 documents in the structure above are quite short. Various companies use different conventions for their document titles. For example, one of my customers titled their quality manual as “SAE AS9100 Quality Management System Quality Manual.”

It is common in regulated industries, such as medical device manufacturing and airspace to call 2nd-level documents Standard Operating Procedures or SOP. Do these companies have “Non-standard Operating Procedures”, so long these titles differentiate them? Since a short name identifies a document, I really cannot justify long-named documents. I preach management system optimization and reduction of waste in all elements of management systems. I invite you too not to make things more difficult than they have to be to deliver the message.

Document number formats for AS9100 Management Systems.

In addition to long tiles, document numbering systems very often can be optimized too. No standard requires assigning a document its number. This practice is an industry standard. Similar to part titles that we discussed above, document numbering practices often may be simplified too. Look at the example below:

A company had some 45 employees. They had two part number formats: one for procedures, another for drawings. AS9100 Procedures used XX-XXX number format. Drawings were numbered as XXXXXXX-XXX. One of the drawings had a number 000077-009. Assemblers simplified the system and called it “seven-seven.”

One can certainly use these long-long numbers for their AS9100 QMS, but is it practical? So far I did not meet a single company that could justify such an approach. When I audited this client, the organization had less than 250 documents. There were no indications that the company will significantly grow in the foreseeable future. Therefore, to use document number format allowing hundreds of thousands of numbers could hardly be justified. The most unreadable part numbers I had to deal with was at a mid size company with 13-digit alphanumeric part number format! Try to write those in your AS9100 audit report!

If you are designing and building a Trident-class submarine, a MIG-27 jet fighter or an international space station, you, most likely, will need millions of parts, so a long part number format would be needed and will make sense. Otherwise, save yourself the trouble of reading all those zeros and make your numbering system practical. One of my customers, who won my “The Best Part Number” Grand Prize, numbered their documents as 101, 102, 103, and so on. Short and sweet!

So far we explored opportunities for improvements in the area of AS document titles and numbers. Yet, there is another issue with part numbers. Many companies relate a document number to a document type. For example, AS20-xxxx indicates a procedure, AS30-xxxx indicates a drawing, ASPOP-xxxx indicates a Production Operating Procedure, etc.

Several QMS that used designation I have worked with have failed. Not long ago, one of my clients mentioned that they ran out of range in their document numbering format. The QMS initially permitted for identifying suppliers through a two-digit identifier within the part number. While the company grew, the number of supplier increased beyond expectations and eventually the company needed more than 99 suppliers. This resulted in the document number format to being able to support new needs.

There are good news and bad news. The bed news is that designation systems can fail. The good news is that there is another way of dealing with document numbers: no designation at all! Using such systems, you give documents or parts sequential numbers. Going further, isn’t the part title the best identifier of the part? One AS9100 company I work with does not use part numbers at all – their AS procedures and instructions are simply identified by titles and a two-digit revision level.

About the Author:

Documentation Structure for AS9100 QMS

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

ISO 10013, Guidelines for quality management system documentation, gives an example of a documentation structure for AS9100 quality management systems. While 10013 suggests using a three-level structure, most companies implement four-level documentation structures to include records, as required by element 4.2.4 Control of Records, of the AS9100 Standard. A typical four-level documentation structure includes: Quality Manual, level 1; Procedures, level 2; Instructions, level 3, and Records – level 4.

Actually, the documentation structure starts from the policy. The AS9100 policy defines, among others, the standards and regulations that an organization intends to comply with. If we choose to use this approach, our quality management system will have five levels, similar to the structure below:

9100 Quality Policy – level 1

AS9100 Quality Manual – level 2

SAE AS9100 Procedures – level 3

SAE AS9100 Instructions – level 4

9100 Records – level 5

Document titles for your AS9100 QMS

As you may have noticed, the titles of AS9100 documents in the structure above are quite short. Various companies use different conventions for their document titles. For example, one of my customers titled their quality manual as “SAE AS9100 Quality Management System Quality Manual.”

This tendency to use long titles and document identifiers like “Standard Operating Procedure” most likely comes from regulated industries. Even though I could not find a requirement for such title formats, overwhelming majority of companies still use these apparently outdated and ineffective conventions. If a short name sufficiently describes a document, let’s use it. I suggest streamlining all elements of AS9100 management systems. Consider this and do not make your AS QMS more complicated than it can be.

Document number formats for AS9100 Management Systems.

It is not a specific requirement of the AS9100 or any other standard to uniquely identify a part or a document. It is perhaps a common-sense measure and a worldwide practice in any documentation system, to give a document or a component a number and a title, and to identify its revision level. As documentation titles, document numbering is an area for creativity and an opportunity for optimization.

A company had some 45 employees. They had two part number formats: one for procedures, another for drawings. AS9100 Procedures used XX-XXX number format. Drawings were numbered as XXXXXXX-XXX. One of the drawings had a number 000077-009. Assemblers simplified the system and called it “seven-seven.”

Is it acceptable to have long and difficult-to-read and remember numbers? Yes, of course! Is it practical? I do not believe so! In the example above, the procedure number, without the tab, contained seven digits. This meant that the system was prepared to handle almost 10 million document or part numbers (PN). The company had approximately 250 documents and probably would never go beyond 300. If nothing else, just reading these numbers with five sequential zeros may give one a headache. Surprisingly, this is not the worst case I have experienced! The company that won my “The Worst Part Number” Grand Prize assigned 12 (!) digits to their part numbers in the alphanumeric format.

I hope it is clear that only when extensive part numbers are justified, we do not have other options. If you build helicopters or satellites, you, no doubt, will need millions of parts and therefore will need long part numbers. If not, make your life easy and stay away from all those zeros. The most practical system I worked with used a three-digit format for their part numbers. 202, 203, 204, and so on. Worked just fine!

Another debatable issue with the part-numbering format is part number designation. Some systems associate a part number with a particular part type. For example, 10xxx indicates a procedure, 20xxx indicates a drawing, PLxxx indicates a policy-level document, and so on. My experience with a number of medical device manufacturers has convinced me in the benefits of a “no designation” system. Three systems that used designation I have worked with have failed.

My experience with a few airspace QMS that used designation approaches showed that “no designation” systems are more practical and flexible. Several QMS that used designation I have worked with have failed. Not long ago, one of our airspace clients mentioned that they ran out of range in their AS document numbering format. That management system in the beginning was set up to identify suppliers through a three-digit extension within the part number. While the company grew, the number of supplier increased beyond expectations and eventually the company needed more than 999 suppliers. This resulted in the document number format not being able to support new needs.

An alternative approach to part numbering is a “no designation” system, where parts are given sequential unique numbers within a specified format, regardless of their type, material, application or other attributes. After all, isn’t the part title the best designator? Seriously, through my entire professional career, I worked only with one company that did not use even document numbers. Their documents were simply identified by titles and a two-digit revision level, like Supplier Qualification Record AA.

About the Author:

A Quality Policy for ISO 9001 Standard

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

ISO 9001 Standard requires a business to establish a quality policy. Specifically, “The management” of a company to “ensure that the quality policy”:

- Is appropriate to the purpose of the organization;

- Includes a commitment to comply with requirements;

- Includes a commitment to continual improvement of the effectiveness of the QMS;

- Provides a framework for establishing and reviewing quality objectives;

- Is communicated and understood within the organization;

- Is reviewed for continuing suitability

One may ask, why we started talking about this requirement. There is a very good reason. Quality policy defines the top-level commitment of your company’s management to establish a QMS in accordance with a particular standard. The reason to talk about it is that most quality policies, per my more than decade long experience as a consultant and an auditor, did not meet requirements of the standard.

Let’s take a look at a few examples of quality policies. If you open your browser and type “iso 9001 quality policy”, you will see a list of companies that placed their quality policies on their Websites. For example, let’s take a look at a few of them:

“It is the policy of [Company name] to provide a range of [services] which is reliable and consistent with the expectations and requirements of its clients; the Company’s objective of consistent high quality performance is met by mandatory adherence to protocol, through staff training and the development of personal responsibility for all personnel, together with the provision of adequate resources, according to the principles of Quality Assurance. Company policy is to review and update as necessary the Quality System through the mediation of a Quality Team, whose members undertake the responsibility of ensuring that the Quality policy is understood, implemented and maintained at all levels within the Company.” Can we say what standard this company is compliant with? Do you see a commitment for continual improvement of the effectiveness of the QMS? Do you understand how this company establishes and reviews their quality objectives? I did not find answers to these questions. However, the policy does commit to communication and understanding of its quality policy and review for suitability.

Let’s take a look at another quality policy: “We at [Company name] are committed to value oriented quality from the perspective of the customer. Quality of workmanship and service are encouraged without adding unduly to cost. Quality is primarily dependent upon individual commitment and acceptance of responsibility by each employee for the quality of the products and services offered, both internal and external to the company. Efforts of continuous improvement focus on enhancement of product and process reliability and customer satisfaction.” Besides questionable language, this quality policy really does not have anything to do with ISO 9001 2000 standard requirements. If we compare it to the set of requirements, we probably will not find a single requirement that is addressed in this policy.

I did not select these examples because they did not comply with the standard. I picked them from the top of the search results, just to show that most quality policies were not written to meet requirements of the standard. If you think these examples are bad, wait a moment. One of my clients came up with a quality policy that is out of this world: “I improve the Quality of Patient Care and all things [Company name]” No! I am not kidding and I did not misspelled or took any words out of this regretful quote!

About the Author:

ISO 9001 Controlling forms

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Do you control your forms within your ISO 9001 quality management system? If you do, you are on the right track. One of the divisive issues with interpretation of ISO 9001 and other standards is control of forms. Various organizations treat forms differently than other QMS documents and do not control them. Per ISO 9001, element 4.2.3, “Documents required by the quality management system shall be controlled.” Let’s investigate if a form qualifies to be a “document” that “shall be controlled”.

Forms and tables are frequently used as quality management system documents. Very often, it is not necessary to write a traditional instruction with the purpose, scope and instruction sections, if a simple table is sufficient to provide these instructions. One of the typical nonconformities that companies get during audits of their quality management systems is against forms that are not part of the documentation system.

Frequently, being asked about not controlled forms, my clients reply: This is “just a form”. I always wonder why should a form be treated differently than any other instruction or a document? If a form is not controlled, how would we know that we need it to begin with? If a form is not part of your ISO 9001 QMS, it cannot be referenced! If your forms are not controlled, how would anyone know that you use the latest revision? Well, exactly what is a form? A quick test will help answer this question. If we have a list of directions telling us to:

- use a 2-column table

- enter your company name into the first column

- enter your company’s Web address into the 2nd column

Most likely, we all would call this three-line guidance an instruction. So, since this is an instruction, it shall be controlled, right?.

OK, now, let’s assume, somebody gave us a two-column table. We also were asked to fill it out. The first column was titled “You company name” and the second column “Company URL”. I bet, most of us would enter our business name in the first column and our URL in the second. Does it mean that we treated this table as an “instruction”? We just did!

These two examples, demonstrate that our first three-line instruction in English (that needs to be controlled), serves the same function, resulting in the same output, as the second form. Therefore, the form as an instruction and “shall”: be controlled as well.

It appears that the puzzlement about forms and their control comes from the fact that forms serve 2 purposes. Blank forms are instructions in tabular language. After a form is filled out, it becomes a record. Records, as a rule, do not have a part or document number or a revision level. Records are controlled by different processes. Remember this and treat your forms as instructions controlled by your documentation procedure. There are a couple of tests you may take when you are thinking about not controlling your form.

- If you created a helpfull form and found it had been changed, would you like to know who did it and why?

- If you changed your form, would you like your employees use the most resent revision?

- If you were on vacation, would you like folks to be able to find your form just by using a reference to it?

If you answered, “yes” at least once, your form is a definite candidate for revision control, and falls under the scope of your ISO 9001 2008 documentation management process.

About the Author:

Deploying Six Sigma

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

Because Six Sigma concepts are designed according to the basic characteristics of a business rather than its size, Six Sigma projects can be successfully deployed in any company, large or small. In addition, companies which do not wish to contend with organization wide deployment may choose to engage a pilot project, where Six Sigma is deployed only within a specific business process.

Some companies may find that there are issues in terms of their ability to provide adequate Six Sigma resources, but these can be addressed through help from professionals including Black Belts and Master Black Belts. These individuals have experience in deploying Six Sigma projects.

One of the most lauded features of Six Sigma is that it is scalable. This means that the concepts engrained within the Six Sigma system can be applied within any business process, no matter how large or complex the process is.

There are occassions when a business may want to have a starter project instead of a full blown rollout, that way the Six Sigma processes can be focused just on a certain department or process. Using this smaller version provides quicker results and possibly with increased accuracy as opposed to a business wide effort.

It also means that companies can see where Six Sigma can be readily applied to other functional departments after the project has been completed. With the resources and concepts gained from the pilot, companies may then deploy Six Sigma in other departments.

About the Author:

How to get great response rates to your customer satisfaction surveys?

Monday, March 30th, 2009

When times are tough, keeping an accurate pulse of your customers’ satisfaction is a question of survival.

In a down market, everybody is revisiting their purchasing decisions searching for every possible means of saving a dollar. Your customers, like everybody else, are asking tough questions before committing to even the most stable business relationships. When payroll isn’t easy to make, we actively start evaluating old business models and cashflow becomes king.

But if your customers don’t answer your surveys, all the effort and expense of measuring goes straight into the trash can. For a satisfaction measurement system to be successful it must achieve adequate rates of responses. The following five points are critical to make this happen:

Don’t waste their time. We don’t live in Mayberry and today everyone is in a hurry. That means that you can’t expect your customers to fill out page after page of monotonous questions. You must show respect for their time and implement a system won’t take more than a couple of minutes of their time.

Ask your customers to participate. You can design the best survey in the world, but if you think distributing them to your offices and waiting for responses is going to work, you’re in for a sad surprise. Make sure your entire organization appreciates the importance of the initiative and actively encourages customers to contribute their opinions.

Build satisfaction measurement daily routines. Don’t let measuring customer satisfaction be a twice a year job you do as an afterthought. Instead, make it part of the way you interact with your customers on a day to day basis. That way you’ll be able to collect a continuous flow of valuable management information.

Don’t hoard the results. The important conclusions and insights that you learn from your measurement system can and should be shared with your customers. That doesn’t mean you need to publish the nitty gritty details, but rather the major initiatives that you’ll be working on. This is a very effective way of letting your customers know you truly value their opinions.

Prove to them that your serious about satisfaction. If you limit your measurement efforts to a wrinkled photocopied printout which hasn’t been changed in six years, you’re sending a very negative message to your customers. Implement a modern technologically advanced system and you’re sending another message altogether.

All of these factors can be easily implemented using the innovative new system called Gustometria. Customers answer short surveys by touching the screens of the “gustometer” while they are waiting for their receipt or invoice. The whole process takes about a minute and the results are available immediately for analysis.

Thanks to the built in business intelligence tools included in Gustometria, you are able to contrast all of your valuation questions quickly and easily with your custom profile questions. You can adapt and change the surveys on the fly, and thanks to the variable structure of each survey, you can measure hundreds of details about your company without having to ask any one customer more than a few questions.

I am convinced that tracking customer and employee satisfaction, on a daily basis, is a true survival tactic in today’s market. If you agree, you must implement Gustometria this week.

Pick up the phone and call Gustometria toll free at 1-877-448-7865.

About the Author:

How many questions should you include in your employee survey?

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

You’ve decided to go to the trouble of measuring your customer or employee satisfaction, and now you need to assure that you’re efforts will provide meaningful and significant results. I am well aware that this isn’t an easy proposition, and that in order to be successful you must find an adequate balance between the number of questions and the time needed to respond.

The purpose behind a customer satisfaction measurement system is to improve your business in order to achieve higher levels of customer loyalty. According to Kevin Cacioppo in Quality Digest, a 5% increase in customer loyalty can result in an increase in profits between 25% and 85%. However, your measurement system will only work if customers respond.

A long tedious customer satisfaction questionnaire is a sure fire way to guarantee low response rates. Nobody enjoys filling out a survey, and you need to show respect to your customers and their time.

Finding this balance, until now, has been one the most difficult mechanisms behind any customer satisfaction program. Ideally, the whole survey process shouldn’t require more than two minutes of your customer’s time, from start to finish. Typically however, a paper-based or interview-based system requires at least double that amount of time.

To get a useable amount of information you will almost certainly want to ask two or three general valuation questions, six or seven profile questions and at least thirty specific questions about your business performance. In total most surveys are about 35 or 40 questions long.

However, I’d like to recommend an exciting new management tool called Gustometria which will literally allow you to measure hundreds of different detailed aspects of your business while respecting the two minute rule I mentioned above.

The Gustometria system facilitates customer participation by being quick, efficient and fun. Customers answer short surveys with their fingers using the touch screens on strategically placed “gustometers”. This interaction requires about a minute and a half of your customer’s time and the responses are immediately available for analysis. Moreover, thanks to the variable structure of the surveys you can literally measure hundreds of details about your business without needing to ask any one customer to answer too many.

The built in business intelligence tools included in Gustometria, enable you to contrast all of your valuation questions quickly and easily with your custom profile questions. You can also adapt and change the surveys on the fly whenever you detect a problem area or a new customer need.

The benefits of the Gustometria system are substantial and easy to put into practice, and you can be up and running in less than a week.

Pick up the phone and call Gustometria toll free at 1-877-448-7865.

About the Author:

What are the essential components of a great Employee Satisfaction Survey?

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

Are you responsible for customer satisfaction in your company? Are you trying to implement an effective way of improving your customers’ perceptions? One of the key steps you must complete is choosing which questions to include in the survey to achieve meaningful and useful results.

Although I can’t pretend to tell you exactly what to include in your survey, the purpose of this article is to orient you towards the key ingredients. Hopefully you will at least be able to use it to check and see if you’ve left out anything important. At the end, I will also give you a recommendation which will boost significantly the return on your surveying investment.

Every valid customer satisfaction survey should include the following five basic categories of questions:

1. General Evaluation Questions

2. Detailed Departmental Questions

3. Effectiveness Questions

4. Client Experience Questions

5. Customer Profile Questions

It is important to include at least two or three general evaluation questions in your survey. One of the most important results of the process should be the identification of factors which maintain a high correlation con overall satisfaction. These factors are where you should expend the greatest effort. Questions like “What is your overall opinion of our performance?” or “Did we adequately meet your expectations?” permit us to establish these correlations.

Next, we need to get into the heart of your survey contents. Start thinking about the complete experience that your customers experiment when they do business with you. Which parts of your organization come into play? With whom do they have contact? Then build specific questions about each of these functional areas of your business. For example you may need to ask, “Was the food well prepared and presented?” or “Was your car ready when you came in to pick it up?”.

Time is always of an essence. For this reason you should include questions to determine if your team is responding efficiently to your customer’s needs. This shows that you respect his or her time and want guarantee an efficient relationship. For example “Was the checkin process quick and easy?” or “Did you have to wait too long for us to take your order?”

The last type of valuation questions you should include center around your customer’s perception of doing business with you. These questions should clarify the impression that you are causing in your customer’s mind. Optimally they should enjoy working with you and believe that you provide a professional and friendly service. “Did we show interest in solving your problems?” and “Was our staff caring and concerned with your recuperation?” are examples of customer experience questions.

The last type of questions you must include are profile questions. It is very important to build relevant customer profiles that you can contrast with your valuation questions. These questions will obviously depend on what is important for your company. A hotel might need to know if the customer is a man or woman, or if the purpose of the stay was business or pleasure. However, a hospital will want to know the age group and illness being treated.

One of my basic recommendations for designing customer satisfaction surveys is to be as specific as possible. Apart from the general evaluation questions, you should try and measure concrete aspects of your business. Don’t bother to ask questions about things beyond your control like, “Was traffic a problem for getting to our establishment?” (unless you’re very close friends with the mayor). Instead concentrate on details that you can take measures and improve on. For a hotel, “Was the bed comfortable?” is an excellent question.

If you’ve gotten this far, I’d like to thank you for your attention. In fact, I’d like to share with you an innovative new solution which can make measuring your customer satisfaction much easier. Thanks to the patented technologies it uses, this new system will not only reduce your costs, but will elevate enormously your participation levels.

Called Gustometria, this system measures customer and employee satisfaction in realtime. Customers answer short surveys by touching the screens of the “gustometer” while they are waiting for their receipt or invoice. The whole process takes about a minute and the results are available immediately for analysis.

More importantly Gustometria incorporates a very sophisticated business intelligence system which will allow you to extract the maximum value from your survey data. You will be able to contrast your custom profile questions with the results of each valuation question. Gustometria also allows you to adapt your surveys on the fly an to structure your surveys in a way which assures high participation rates.

I am convinced that tracking customer and employee satisfaction, on a daily basis, is a true survival tactic in today’s market. If you agree, you must implement Gustometria this week.

Pick up the phone and call Gustometria toll free at 1-877-448-7865.

About the Author:

Quality Manual Review Checklist for ISO 9001:2000 QMS

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

Some people call it “senior moments”, some people call it “spaced it out”, simply speaking, we all sometimes forget something – human nature.

The same thing happens when writing ISO 9001 quality manuals – very often some of the requirements of the standard are forgotten and not addressed.

Fortunately, there is a simple solution – use a checklist. A quality manual for ISO 9001 standard can be a somewhat complex document. It is not unusual that some of requirements may be missed and not addressed in the quality manual. Using a checklist will help you remember to address all the requirements. This is why many registrars use quality manual review checklists. If you are in the process of developing or tuning up your quality manual, you might ask your registrar for a checklist. If your registrar doesn’t have it, we will develop our own.

Actually, designing a quality manual review checklist is a pretty straightforward process. You may begin from establishing, so to speak, a table of contents or a top-level list containing section titles. Element eight, for example, may be started as 8 – Management, analysis and improvement; 8.1 General, 8.2 – Monitoring and measurement, etc.

Obviously, there are numerous ways to design a checklist. Most typical format I have seen through my auditing career was a 3-column table allowing documentation of the number of the clause, the content of the requirement and the location of response to this particular clause. Take a look at the following example: Element 5 of the standard starts from the title: “Management responsibility”. Clause 5.1 is a title also. Numbering these titles 5 and 5.1 respectively, placing these titles in the checklist and indicating where in the QMS these titles are located will give us a starting point.

After creating this Table of contents, continue adding other requirements for the corresponding clauses of the standard. We will review element 6.2.2 as an example. The first requirement of this element is: “Personnel performing work affecting product quality shall be competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills and experience.” Depending on how detailed you want your checklist to be, you may include the entire requirement or split it into sub-elements: 6.2.2.i – Personnel performing work affecting product quality shall be competent on the basis of appropriate education; 6.2.2.ii – Personnel performing work affecting product quality shall be competent on the basis of training, etc.

When you document all applicable requirements of ISO 9001 standard in your checklist, you will be able to verify if your quality manual meets the requirement of your company and the standard.

The process above described a way to prepare a checklist for verifying quality manual for one standard. In fact, many organizations develop management systems for more than one standard. As an auditor, very often I see integrated ISO 9001 / ISO 14001 management systems. Don’t panic! The process is the same: integrate specific clauses on the second standard into your list which is based on the starting standard.

Want to save time and get your ISO 9001 quality manual review checklist fast? Click links below to see how we can help you get started in no time!

About the Author:

How often should you collect customer opinions?

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

The truth is that the majority of businesses don’t have a customer satisfaction measurement system. Many limit themselves to tracking the number of complaints and an occasional conversation with company salesmen. At best, they find out they have a problem when customers stop sending in orders. Could this be your case?

While in a boom market customer satisfaction is still important, but in tough times like these you ignore it at your own peril. If you are revisiting every expenditure, looking for savings, what do you think your customers are doing? If you want to survive, you’ve got to surprise them with exceptional value.

A few years ago I had the pleasure of meeting Jack Welch (no doubt he has long forgotten the occasion). For me, one of his wisest pieces of advice is, “you can’t improve what you don’t measure.”

Today, measuring customer satisfaction isn’t a luxury item, but instead an essential survival tactic.

If you want to prosper in this down market, you need to integrate customer satisfaction measurement into your daily routines. I’m not talking about a stale report received three months after the fact, but instead a constant monitoring of your commercial vital signs. Customer satisfaction is like high blood pressure. If you find out too late, the game is probably over.

That’s why the answer to the first question in this article is “you can’t measure customer satisfaction too frequently.”

However, to do this economically and efficiently you will need cutting edge tools. Measuring customer satisfaction isn’t simple. It requires some thought, a lot of hard work and a clear dedication to exceeding customer expectations.

That’s why I’d like to recommend an exciting and innovative management tool called Gustometria. This service allows you to easily and affordably measure your customer satisfaction in realtime. You’ll be able to react immediately to detected problems and adapt to the changing needs of the market. Thanks to the built in business intelligence reports included with the service, you will be able to analyze all the collected information.

I am convinced that tracking customer and employee satisfaction, on a daily basis, is a true survival tactic in today’s market. If you agree, you must implement Gustometria this week.

Don’t hesitate to pick up the phone and call Gustometria toll free at 1-877-448-7865.

About the Author: