Posts Tagged ‘six sigma’

Having A Responsible Office Romance

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Office romances are often very damaging to a persons career. Many workplace romances are inappropriate as well such as a romantic relationship with your boss. Being in a relationship like this with your boss could lead others to feel like you are being favored when this is not necessarily the case. Here is some information on why to avoid the office romance and tips if you do find yourself in the middle of a workplace love affair.

When you are in a romantic relationship you can often be distracted. This distraction is carried in to work more often when your romance is with someone in your office or workplace. You may find it difficult to give criticism or reprimand your significant other. Additionally, you cross lines in a relationship with an employee that is beneath you. You may be getting into areas that could be looked at as sexual harassment.

Another reason to avoid the office love affair is because many times a conflict in the relationship can be brought to the workplace and vice versa. Oftentimes, you may have disagreements in the office and they will continue outside of the work environment.

When you have tried to avoid the office romance but you are undeniably in love with a co-worker you should be sure to set some boundaries for your relationship. If you are attempting to have an office romance make sure you are discreet. You should not broadcast your relationship with the whole office. You should discuss with your partner how you will handle different work scenarios. Never let your feelings get in the way of how you do your job or in how you make a work decision.

If you follow some of these guidelines and set some boundaries you will be able to minimize the career impact if the relationship does not last. However, whenever possible you should try to avoid an office romance.

About the Author:

Deploying Six Sigma

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

Because Six Sigma concepts are designed according to the basic characteristics of a business rather than its size, Six Sigma projects can be successfully deployed in any company, large or small. In addition, companies which do not wish to contend with organization wide deployment may choose to engage a pilot project, where Six Sigma is deployed only within a specific business process.

Some companies may find that there are issues in terms of their ability to provide adequate Six Sigma resources, but these can be addressed through help from professionals including Black Belts and Master Black Belts. These individuals have experience in deploying Six Sigma projects.

One of the most lauded features of Six Sigma is that it is scalable. This means that the concepts engrained within the Six Sigma system can be applied within any business process, no matter how large or complex the process is.

There are occassions when a business may want to have a starter project instead of a full blown rollout, that way the Six Sigma processes can be focused just on a certain department or process. Using this smaller version provides quicker results and possibly with increased accuracy as opposed to a business wide effort.

It also means that companies can see where Six Sigma can be readily applied to other functional departments after the project has been completed. With the resources and concepts gained from the pilot, companies may then deploy Six Sigma in other departments.

About the Author:

Comparing DMAIC and DMADV

Friday, April 10th, 2009

Six Sigma has two methodologies which are DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, and control) and DMADV (define, measure, analyze, design, and verify). Obviously these two methods have a lot in common, but it is important to note that due to the differences they are not interchangeable.

The goal of both types of approaches is to reduce the defect numbers to 3.4 to every one million opportunities. Facts and statistical means are used on basic problems, generally quality related, to look for answers. Lastly, both of these approaches attempt to financially and business wise, increase the organizational objectives.

These two processes are dissimilar in some ways. DMAIC helps to enhance the procedures already in place and looks to see the way they are applicable in the worksite. Also, DMAIC then looks to improve the business processes with the goal of reducing or eliminating the defects. DMADV, in it’s approach, starts with differentiating the requirements of the customer and how that impacts a service or product. It then creates criterion for the business to assist in moving toward meeting customer requests.

The contrast show the DMADV generally comes into the picture when there a product is in the beginning stages and it requires a maturing process in order to develop into what the customer is requesting. Otherwise, if there is a service or commodity already established but not rising to customer demands, DMAIC is useful.

There are levels of assistance available in the way of Black Belts and Master Black Belts for a company with no Six Sigma expertise. The choice of DMAIC or DMADV would be up to them after they reviewed the issues. They’re strength would be in team assistance in starting Six Sigma.

About the Author:

Six Sigma Implementation Tips For Success

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

Six Sigma projects bring about great improvement in organizations. It is necessary to sustain these improvements – and that requires efforts for continual improvement initiatives to be undertaken at various levels. This helps organizations get a competitive edge over others, fine tune their processes to customer needs and sustain themselves in tough business conditions. There are various methodologies such as DMAIC and DMADV used, but companies sometimes do not achieve the expected results in terms of employee morale and customer satisfaction. There is a variation in levels of success amongst Six Sigma adopters. There are issues that need to be addressed to achieve success in the change deployment process.

The foundation of support for Six Sigma must be strong amongst the employees and management. It is necessary for all parties to understand the current state of the business as well as the desired goals of the business. Additionally, speed and time often present a common problem, because of timeframes imposed at the onset of the process. The time schedule is honored, while certain activities which must be completed carefully and correctly are overlooked. The end result is that of a speedy job, but desired results are not achieved.

For the Six Sigma project deployment to be successful in a real sense, the aim should be to achieve a common objective shared by all. A team cannot bring about change in a short timespan. They have to communicate well to get the support of everyone involved. Further, they need to ensure that the pace of improvement activities is maintained. The entire workforce has to be galvanized to come together to achieve progress. If the systemic constraints that limited progress in the older system are not eliminated, new roadmaps, tools and techniques cannot make miracles. This would be a case of new vision with old constraints – making it difficult to achieve anything. Such roadblocks should be addressed in the beginning of the project, which will help boost morale and provide momentum to overcome all types of hurdles throughout the organization.

Successful management of large projects should allow for their division into smaller projects. This will allow team members to achieve short term goals, thus boosting their morale and confidence. Higher morale will lead to a greater chance for success and profits. Any initiative must be required to produce some measurable economic benefit, and care must be taken to assure that all processes are correlated to ultimate bottom line success.

Strong leadership in an organization is important as well, and is not defined by quantity, but quality. If change is to come to the company, each project needs to have leaders who can stimulate breakthroughs and transform cultures. Minimizing risk and bringing efficient change must be the goal. Upper management must understand and addresse these issues if expected results are to be achieved by the Six Sigma deployment.

About the Author:

Meaningful Data Collection Leads To Six Sigma Success

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

Defects and variations in products and services cause dissatisfaction for the customer. This is where the need for Six Sigma improvement products arises. These projects are aimed at achieving zero defects in business processes. In the Measure phase of Six Sigma, the collection of relevant data is necessary so that it can be analyzed and further improvements brought about. This data is important as it comes from customers – internal as well as external. If you want to get the right data, it is necessary for you to ask the right questions.

In the Measure phase, the data that is collected likely will come from team members who are affected due to the changes that are being made. Similarly, when the end user or external customer is the source, getting them to provide you with the precise information is possible only when you ask the right questions. The most important thing to do is approach the right person for information. That person should be aware of the utility and the importance of the data being collected.

The teams need to clearly inform the customer of the need and reasons for the data, as that is the only way they will get answers that aren’t tainted with misgivings or misunderstandings about the objective. The person who aske the question also needs to be clear of the goals. Often, by passing on the collection of the data to a third party, impartiality can be assured.

The place and time where the questions are asked can also have a direct effect on the answers. If a question is asked in the middle of the work day, the person may temper their answer because they are busy and don’t have time to answer. The format of questions should be simple and easy to understand. Questionnaires are appropriate to use, but for the most success, they should be formatted in columns for easier comprehension. The easier you make it for the person answering, the better their answers will be.

When beginning the data collection process it is also important to provide guidelines on how to answer the questions to assure the respondents give the right answers. Teams should always note the name, department and job description of the staff member answering the questions, so that followup can be done if clarification is needed later. Summarily, the data that is collect is the basis for the entire Six Sigma implementation, so it must be complete and correct. Asking the right questions in a plain and simple way is the key to getting the answers needed to move forward in the process.

About the Author: